The Hume-Edwards principle and the cosmological argument

International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 43 (3):149-165 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On ‘a new cosmological argument’.Graham Oppy - 2000 - Religious Studies 36 (3):345-353.
Merely possible explanation.Ghislain Guigon - 2011 - Religious Studies 47 (3):359-370.
More on part IX of Hume's dialogues.James Franklin - 1980 - Philosophical Quarterly 30 (118):69-71.
A response to Almeida and Judisch.Alexander Pruss & Richard M. Gale - 2003 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 53 (2):65-72.
The Hume-Edwards Objection to the Cosmological Argument.William F. Vallicella - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:423-443.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
615 (#27,191)

6 months
122 (#29,076)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University

Citations of this work

What Work the Fundamental?Ricki Leigh Bliss - 2019 - Erkenntnis 84 (2):359-379.
No Work for Fundamental Facts.Thomas Oberle - 2022 - Philosophical Quarterly 73 (4):983-1003.
Free Will and Ultimate Explanation.Boris Kment - 2017 - Philosophical Issues 27 (1):114-130.

View all 11 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Two criticisms of the cosmological argument.W. L. Rowe - 1984 - In J. Houston (ed.), Is it reasonable to believe in God? Edinburgh: Handsel Press. pp. 441-459.
The Cosmological Argument.[author unknown] - 1977 - Noûs 11 (1):61-64.

Add more references