Catholic Medical Quarterly 69 (2):17-20 (2019)

Authors
Michal Pruski
University of Manchester
Abstract
This paper looks at the Catholic justification of medical interventions in ectopic pregnancies. The paper first shows that the way how Double Effect Reasoning is often applied to ectopic pregnancies is not consistent with the way Aquinas introduces this mode of reasoning. The paper then shows certain problems in common defences of the use of salpingectomies. The paper then re-evaluates the medical interventions used in the management of ectopic pregnancies, with both a focus on the aim of the treatment and the timing of the treatment.
Keywords Aquinas  ectopic pregnancy  double effect  salpingectomy  self-defence
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,163
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Against Salpingostomy as a Treatment for Ectopic Pregnancy.Samuel E. Hager - 2016 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 16 (1):39-48.
Update on Selected Ethical Questions: New Methods of Handling Ectopic Pregnancies.Ectopic Pregnancies - forthcoming - Communicating the Catholic Vision of Life: Proceedings of the Twelfth Bishops' Workshop, Dallas, Texas.
Methotrexate, Character, and Ectopic Pregnanacy.Daniel P. Maher - 2001 - Linacre Quarterly 68 (3):224-40.
Ethics of Ectopic Operations.T. Lincoln Bouscaren - 1944 - Milwaukee, Wis., The Bruce Publishing Company.
Moral Absolutism and Ectopic Pregnancy.Christopher Kaczor - 2001 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 26 (1):61 – 74.
Who is Entitled to Double Effect?Joseph Boyle - 1991 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 16 (5):475-494.
The Danger of Double Effect.P. A. Reed - 2012 - Christian Bioethics 18 (3):287-300.
Bodily Invasions.Helen Watt - 2011 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 11 (1):49-51.
A Double Dose of Double Effect.C. E. Kendall - 2000 - Journal of Medical Ethics 26 (3):204-205.
Double Effect Reasoning: Why We Need It.Helen Watt - 2017 - Ethics and Medicine 33 (1):13-19.
The Principle of Double Effect as a Guide for Medical Decision-Making.Georg Spielthenner - 2008 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 11 (4):465-473.
An Argument Against the Use of Methotrexate in Ectopic Pregnancies.Maria T. De Goede - 2014 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 14 (4):625-635.
Aquinas, Double-Effect Reasoning, and the Pauline Principle.Bernard G. Prusak - 2015 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 89 (3):505-520.
Opioids, Double Effect, and the Prospects of Hastening Death.Philip A. Reed - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 46 (5):505-515.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-10-26

Total views
23 ( #492,865 of 2,507,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #140,021 of 2,507,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes