Clinical Ethics (3):147775092090345 (2020)

Authors
Michal Pruski
University of Manchester
Abstract
This paper follows on from a brief debate about the role of conscientious objection in healthcare, where the issue arose as to whether conscientious objection is (or can) be a tool of resistance against systemic injustice. The paper contributes to this debate by highlighting that some authors generally opposed to conscientious objection in healthcare have shown some support to this idea. Perhaps if there is one area in which all can agree, it is that in healthcare conscientious objection should be allowed so as to prevent cases of systemic injustice.
Keywords Conscientious objection  discrimination  healthcare  injustice  whistleblowing
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/1477750920903457
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,337
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Challenge of Brain Death for the Sanctity of Life Ethic.Peter Singer - 2018 - Ethics and Bioethics (in Central Europe) 8 (3-4):153-165.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Selective Conscientious Objection.Mark Anderson & William O’Meara - 1988 - Philosophy Research Archives 14 (9999):1-19.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-02-15

Total views
15 ( #698,152 of 2,507,887 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,715 of 2,507,887 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes