A new free-will defence

Religious Studies 39 (2):211-223 (2003)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper argues that if creatures are to have significant free will, then God's essential omni-benevolence and essential omnipotence cannot logically preclude Him from creating a world containing a moral evil. The paper maintains that this traditional conclusion does not need to rest on reliance on subjunctive conditionals of free will. It can be grounded in several independent ways based on premises that many will accept.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Free will and the Christian faith.W. S. Anglin - 1990 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The Problem of Evil and a Plausible Defence.Frank J. Murphy - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (2):243-250.
Ideal worlds and the transworld untrustworthy.Michael J. Almeida - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (1):113-123.
The Prospects for the Free Will Defence.Bruce Langtry - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (2):142-152.
Free will and the problem of evil.James Cain - 2004 - Religious Studies 40 (4):437-456.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
121 (#143,607)

6 months
14 (#151,397)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander R. Pruss
Baylor University

Citations of this work

The Free Will Defense Revisited: The Instrumental Value of Significant Free Will.Frederick Choo & Esther Goh - 2019 - International Journal of Theology, Philosophy and Science 4:32-45.
Divine Responsibility Without Divine Freedom.Michael Bergmann & J. A. Cover - 2006 - Faith and Philosophy 23 (4):381-408.
On the Value of Freedom To Do Evil.Joshua Rasmussen - 2013 - Faith and Philosophy 30 (4):418-428.

View all 9 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references