Spinoza's Conception of Sovereignty

History of European Ideas 27 (3):289-306 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The article argues that Spinoza's principle of political order represents a conception of sovereignty which is both historically intelligible and analytically coherent.The appropriateness of four meanings of sovereignty to Spinoza's political theory is considered. Then, after examining Spinoza's use of Hobbes's still influential touchstone for the modern theory of sovereignty, Spinoza's conception is discussed in the light of the role that customary practice and republicanism play in his political theory. The analysis of sovereignty also prompts engagement with a range of meanings of the notions of constitutionalism and absolute rule.The argument demonstrates that while Spinoza employs some different criteria, he establishes a conception of sovereignty which needs to be recognised as no less internally consistent than Hobbes's. Moreover, both conceptions contain problems. Although Hobbes demonstrates the abstract logic of authority, the theoretical consequence he draws concerning sovereignty entailing a unitary state has been successfully challenged. Spinoza's conception of sovereignty is based on the logic of customary practice, but the manner in which customary practice is ultimately unsusceptible of analytical justification renders his notion also vulnerable to challenge

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 102,020

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Spinoza and Political Absolutism.Justin Steinberg - 2017 - In Yitzhak Y. Melamed & Hasana Sharp (eds.), Spinoza's Political Treatise: A Critical Guide. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. pp. 175 – 189.
Spinoza's “Republican Idea of Freedom”.Michael A. Rosenthal - 2021 - In Yitzhak Y. Melamed (ed.), A Companion to Spinoza. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley. pp. 402–409.
Amerikan Aristocracy.Patrick D. Anderson - 2022 - Radical Philosophy Review 25 (1):1-32.
Sovereignty and Obedience.Ursula Goldenbaum - 2011 - In Desmond M. Clarke & Catherine Wilson (eds.), The Oxford handbook of philosophy in early modern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
The State: Spinoza's Institutional Turn.Sandra Field - 2015 - In Andre Santos Campos (ed.), Spinoza: Basic Concepts. Burlington, VT, USA: Imprint Academic. pp. 142-154.
Foucault’s Analytics of Sovereignty.Eli B. Lichtenstein - 2021 - Critical Horizons 22 (3):287-305.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-23

Downloads
34 (#678,280)

6 months
5 (#1,092,841)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Spinoza on Positive Freedom.David West - 1993 - Political Studies 41 (2):284-96.
Liberalism and Hobbes and Spinoza.Douglas Den Uyl & Stuart D. Warner - 1987 - Studia Spinozana: An International and Interdisciplinary Series 3:261-318.
The Soveraign and His Counsellours.Susan Moller Okin - 1982 - Political Theory 10 (1):49-75.
Spinoza--Beyond Hobbes and Rousseau.Georg Geismann - 1991 - Journal of the History of Ideas 52 (1):35-53.

Add more references