Pourquoi être sincère? L’actualité de la querelle du mensonge entre Benjamin Constant et Immanuel Kant

Kant Studien 110 (3):357-392 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Kant’s emphasis on the immorality of lying even to a murderer at the door who is asking about a victim hidden inside has drawn criticism ever since. The example originally given by Constant has been read as the thread of morality by totalitarian ruthlessness. In order to defend the importance of Kant’s moral philosophy, many critics have tried to update his position by taking into account the threat of modern totalitarianism. Nonetheless, this article tries to argue that Kant is right, especially since the rise of post-truth politics. Sincerity towards oneself and towards others remains the basis of democracy: we have to admit what seems to be the truth regardless of our feelings about it.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mal, mensonge et mauvaise foi: Une lecture de Kant.Anne-Marie Guillaume - 1995 - Namur, Belgique: Presses universitaires de Namur.
On Lying: Kant and Benjamin Constant.Jules Vuillemin - 1982 - Kant Studien 73 (1-4):413-424.
The Truth About Kant On Lies.James Edwin Mahon - 2009 - In Clancy W. Martin (ed.), The Philosophy of Deception. Oxford University Press.
JAK PRZEKONAĆ KANTA DO KŁAMSTWA? APORIE IMPERATYWU KATEGORYCZNEGO.Michał Piekarz - 2015 - Hybris, Revista de Filosofí­A (30):[113-131.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-09-07

Downloads
349 (#55,455)

6 months
258 (#8,560)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Kant-Bibliographie 2019.Margit Ruffing - 2021 - Kant Studien 112 (4):623-660.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references