Public and Private Citizenship: From Gender Invisibility to Feminist Inclusiveness

Feminist Review 60 (1):84-104 (1998)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Conceptions of citizenship which rest on an abstract and universal notion of the individual founder on their inability to recognize the political relevance of gender. Such conceptions, because their ‘gender-neutrality’ has the effect of excluding women, are not helpful to the project of promoting the full citizenship of women. The question of citizenship is often reduced to either political citizenship, in terms of an instrumental notion of political participation, or social citizenship, in terms of an instrumental notion of economic (in)dependence. The paper argues for the recognition of citizenship as gendered, and as an ethical, that is non-instrumental, social status which is distinct from both political participation and economic (in)dependence. What unites us as citizens, in our equal membership of the political community, need not rely on a conception of us as ‘neutral’ (abstract, universalized, genderless) individuals undertaking one specific activity located in the public realm, but can take account of the diverse ways in which we engage in ethically-grounded activities on the basis of our different genders, ethnic and cultural backgrounds and other differences, in both the public and private realms. A convincing feminist conception of citizenship necessarily involves a radical redefinition of the public/private distinction to accommodate the recognition of citizenship practices in the private realm. The paper builds on the observation that the concept of ‘citizenship’ is broader than the concept of ‘the political’ (or ‘the social/economic’), and contends that feminism provides us with the emancipatory potential of gendered subjectivity, which applies to both men and women. The recognition of gendered subjectivity opens the way to the recognition of the diversity of citizenship practices. It is not that women need to be liberated from the private realm, in order to take part in the public realm as equal citizens, but that women – and men – already undertake responsibilities of citizenship in both the public and the private realms.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Citizenship: Towards a Feminist Synthesis.Ruth Lister - 1997 - Feminist Review 57 (1):28-48.
Women, Citizenship and Difference.Nira Yuval-Davis - 1997 - Feminist Review 57 (1):4-27.
Why Citizenship: Where, When and How Children?Ruth Lister - 2007 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 8 (2):693-718.
Women and Citizenship.Marilyn Friedman (ed.) - 2005 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
The Politics of the Personal: A Liberal Approach.Corey Brettschneider - 2007 - American Political Science Review 101 (1):19-31.
From Private to Public: Is the Public/Private Distinction Gender Discrimination? [REVIEW]Dana Tabrea - 2010 - Meta: Research in Hermeneutics, Phenomenology, and Practical Philosophy 2 (2):562-567.
Jean-Jacques Rousseau on women and citizenship.Catherine Larrère - 2011 - History of European Ideas 37 (2):218-222.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-24

Downloads
18 (#785,610)

6 months
10 (#219,185)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?