Did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's?

British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):336-340 (1974)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1093/bjps/25.4.336

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

The enlightenment, Popper and Einstein.Nicholas Maxwell - 2005 - In Yong Shi, David L. Olson & Antonie Stam (eds.), Knowledge and Wisdom: Advances in Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Human Systems Management,. IOS Press.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.
Emergence and Interpretation of Lorentz Invariance.Michel Janssen - unknown
Method and appraisal in the physical sciences: the critical background to modern science, 1800-1905.Colin Howson (ed.) - 1976 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Reconsidering a Scientific Revolution: The Case of Einstein 6ersus Lorentz.Michel Janssen - unknown
The Light of Einstein.David Atkinson - unknown
The history of quantum mechanics as a decisive argument favoring Einstein over lorentz.R. M. Nugayev - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (1):44-63.
The lorentz transformation group of the special theory of relativity without Einstein's isotropy convention.Abraham Ungar - 1986 - Philosophy of Science 53 (3):395-402.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
122 (#144,260)

6 months
10 (#257,583)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

On lorentz's methodology.Arthur I. Miller - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (1):29-45.
The contemporary state of philosophy of science in Britain.Colin Howson & John Worrall - 1974 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 5 (2):363-374.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Autobiographical Notes.Max Black, Albert Einstein & Paul Arthur Schilpp - 1949 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 15 (2):157.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (I).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (2):95-123.
Why did Einstein's programme supersede lorentz's? (II).Elie Zahar - 1973 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 24 (3):223-262.
The logic of special relativity.S. J. Prokhovnik - 1967 - London,: Cambridge University Press.

View all 13 references / Add more references