Should we expect to feel as if we understand consciousness?

Journal of Consciousness Studies 3 (4):303-12 (1996)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

We tend to assume that progress in answering the ‘hard question’ of consciousness will be accompanied by a subjective feeling of greater understanding. However, in order to feel we understand how one state of affairs arises from another, we have to deceive ourselves into thinking we have found a type of causal link which in reality may not exist . I draw from and expand upon Rosch's model, which specifies the conditions under which this self-deceptive kind of causal attribution arises. I argue that the mind-body relationship may not meet these conditions, especially because of its potential novelty and uniqueness. We should not therefore expect to subjectively feel we understand consciousness

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The first-person perspective: A test for naturalism.Lynne Rudder Baker - 1998 - American Philosophical Quarterly 35 (4):327-348.
Three facets of consciousness.David Woodruff Smith - 2001 - Axiomathes 12 (1-2):55-85.
Witness-Consciousness: Its Definition, Appearance and Reality.Miri Albahari - 2009 - Journal of Consciousness Studies 16 (1):62-84.
Consciousness and self-consciousness.Uriah Kriegel - 2004 - The Monist 87 (2):182-205.
Consciousness and Explanation.Laleh Kathleen Quinn - 2000 - Dissertation, The University of Arizona
The Engineering Thesis in Machine Consciousness.Piotr Boltuc - 2012 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 16 (2):187-207.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
66 (#241,176)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references