Simplified semantics for basic relevant logics

&
Journal of Philosophical Logic 21 (2):217 - 232 (1992)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1007/bf00248640

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,164

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Relational proof system for relevant logics.Ewa Orlowska - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (4):1425-1440.
On permutation in simplified semantics.Greg Restall & Tony Roy - 2009 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 38 (3):333 - 341.
Neighborhoods for entailment.Lou Goble - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (5):483-529.
Subintuitionistic Logics.Greg Restall - 1994 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 35 (1):116-129.
Relevant logics and their rivals.Richard Sylvan & Ross Brady (eds.) - 1982 - Atascadero, CA: Ridgeview Pub. Co..
Simplified semantics for relevant logics (and some of their rivals).Greg Restall - 1993 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 22 (5):481 - 511.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
85 (#191,493)

6 months
12 (#174,629)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Priest
CUNY Graduate Center

Citations of this work

Paraconsistent logic.Graham Priest - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Varieties of Relevant S5.Shawn Standefer - 2023 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 32 (1):53–80.
Abstract objects.Gideon Rosen - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Reduced models for relevant logics without ${\rm WI}$.John K. Slaney - 1987 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28 (3):395-407.

Add more references