Conjunction and contonktion revisited

Analysis 24 (6):191 (1964)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Add categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conjunction and Contonktion Revisited.A. Prior - 1964 - Analysis 24 (6):191 - 195.
Quantum logic revisited.L. Román & B. Rumbos - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (6):727-734.
The Problem of Irrelevant Conjunction — Revisited.Branden Fitelson & Jim Hawthorne - unknown
Generalized conjunction and temporal modification.Peter Lasersohn - 1992 - Linguistics and Philosophy 15 (4):381 - 410.
Selfextensional Logics with a Conjunction.Ramon Jansana - 2006 - Studia Logica 84 (1):63-104.
Believing conjunctions.Simon J. Evnine - 1999 - Synthese 118 (2):201-227.
The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?Daniel Osherson - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (3):467-477.
Mathematical instrumentalism meets the conjunction objection.Hawthorne James - 1996 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 25 (4):363-397.
Cædmon's Conjunction: Cædmon's Hymn 7a Revisited.Mary Blockley - 1998 - Speculum 73 (1):1-31.
A problem for confirmation theoretic accounts of the conjunction fallacy.Martin Jönsson & Elias Assarsson - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (2):437-449.
Theory-conjunction and mercenary reliance.J. D. Trout - 1992 - Philosophy of Science 59 (2):231-245.
Prior’s OIC nonconservativity example revisited.Lloyd Humberstone - 2014 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 24 (3):209-235.
The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?K. Tentori - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (3):467-477.
The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction?Katya Tentori, Nicolao Bonini & Daniel Osherson - 2004 - Cognitive Science 28 (3):467-477.
On the nature of the conjunction fallacy.Rodrigo Moro - 2009 - Synthese 171 (1):1 - 24.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-02-20

Downloads
0

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

To Be F Is To Be G.Cian Dorr - 2016 - Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):39-134.
Higher‐order metaphysics.Lukas Skiba - 2021 - Philosophy Compass 16 (10):1-11.
What is wrong with classical negation?Nils Kürbis - 2015 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 92 (1):51-86.
Is inferentialism circular?Jaroslav Peregrin - 2018 - Analysis 78 (3):450-454.

View all 18 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references