Purifying applied mathematics and applying pure mathematics: how a late Wittgensteinian perspective sheds light onto the dichotomy

Abstract

In this work we argue that there is no strong demarcation between pure and applied mathematics. We show this first by stressing non-deductive components within pure mathematics, like axiomatization and theory-building in general. We also stress the “purer” components of applied mathematics, like the theory of the models that are concerned with practical purposes. We further show that some mathematical theories can be viewed through either a pure or applied lens. These different lenses are tied to different communities, which endorse different evaluative standards for theories. We evaluate the distinction between pure and applied mathematics from a late Wittgensteinian perspective. We note that the classical exegesis of the later Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics, due to Maddy, leads to a clear-cut but misguided demarcation. We then turn our attention to a more niche interpretation of Wittgenstein by Dawson, which captures aspects of the aforementioned distinction more accurately. Building on this newer, maverick interpretation of the later Wittgenstein’s philosophy of mathematics, and endorsing an extended notion of meaning as use which includes social, mundane uses, we elaborate a fuzzy, but more realistic, demarcation. This demarcation, relying on family resemblance, is based on how direct and intended technical applications are, the kind of evaluative standards featured, and the range of rhetorical purposes at stake.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,879

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-23

Downloads
5 (#1,212,705)

6 months
2 (#257,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Deniz Sarikaya
Vrije Universiteit Brussel

Similar books and articles

Logical Foundations of Applied Mathematics.V. V. Nalimov - 1974 - Synthese 27 (1-2):211 - 250.
Apriority and Applied Mathematics.Robert A. Holland - 1992 - Synthese 92 (3):349 - 370.
Towards a Philosophy of Applied Mathematics.Christopher Pincock - 2009 - In Otávio Bueno & Øystein Linnebo (eds.), New Waves in Philosophy of Mathematics. Palgrave-Macmillan.
Mathematical Narratives.James Robert Brown - 2014 - European Journal of Analytic Philosophy 10 (2):59-73.
A Structuralist Approach to Applying Mathematics.Chris John Pincock - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley
Data Analysis: Models or Techniques? [REVIEW]Paul Humphreys - 2013 - Foundations of Science 18 (3):579-581.
The Philosophical Problems of Applied Mathematics.Robert Anderson Holland - 1989 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago
Wittgenstein on Pure and Applied Mathematics.Ryan Dawson - 2014 - Synthese 191 (17):4131-4148.
Reason, Habit, and Applied Mathematics.David Sherry - 2009 - Hume Studies 35 (1-2):57-85.