AbstractThe problem that underlies Rawls' The Law of Peoples is the problem of how something particular—western— may become universal and human. Rawls claims that he solves this problem by means of extending particular western rights to other non western peoples. The extension of western liberal rights is done by a second original position similar to the first one in A Theory of Justice. The paper tries to prove that the second original position, in its second step, is not similar to the first one and the parties taking part in this second original position are not symmetrically situated. Rawls' proposal falls into ethnocentrism and eurocentrism. The only way to transform particular rights into universal rights is by means of a universal multicultural dialogue where all peoples can make proposals and listen to other peoples' proposals
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Intercultural Dialogue and Human Rights.Antonio Perez-Estevez - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 11:17-25.
Unsavory Implications of a Theory of Justice and the Law of Peoples: The Denial of Human Rights and the Justification of Slavery.Uwe Steinhoff - 2012 - Philosophical Forum 43 (2):175-196.
The Challenge of Human Rights: Origin, Development and Significance.John Mahoney - 2006 - Blackwell.
William Talbott’s Which Rights Should Be Universal? [REVIEW]David A. Reidy, D. J. & D. Ph - 2008 - Human Rights Review 9 (2):181-191.
Human Embryos in the Original Position?Russell Disilvestro - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):285 – 304.
Human Rights and Modern Western Faith: An Orthodox Christian Assessment.Vigen Guroian - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (2):241-247.
The Law of Peoples: The Old and the New.Chris Naticchia - 2005 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 2 (3):353-369.
Human Rights Thinking in Relationship to African Nation-States: Some Suggestions in Response to Simeon O. Ilesanmi.Preston N. Williams - 1995 - Journal of Religious Ethics 23 (2):323-331.
International Justice, Human Rights and Neutrality.Saladin Meckled-Garcia - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (2):153-174.
Individuals and Relational Beings: Expanding the Universal Human Rights Model.P. J. Lomelino - 2007 - Social Philosophy Today 23:87-101.
Human Rights Without Foundations.Joseph Raz - 2010 - In J. Tasioulas & S. Besson (eds.), The Philosphy of International Law. Oxford University Press.
The Limits of Irony: Rorty and the China Challenge.Randall Peerenboom - 2000 - Philosophy East and West 50 (1):56-89.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.