David J. Stump, Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the A Priori , xviii + 176 pp., £85 [Book Review]

Ratio 29 (4) (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1111/rati.12156

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the a Priori.David J. Stump - 2015 - New York: Routledge.
David J. Stump, Conceptual Change and the Philosophy of Science: Alternative Interpretations of the A Priori. Reviewed by.Mohammad Mahdi Sadrforati - 2016 - Philosophy in Review 36 (1):33-35.
Arthur Pap’s Functional Theory of the A Priori.David J. Stump - 2011 - Hopos: The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science 1 (2):273-290.
Defending conventions as functionally a priori knowledge.David J. Stump - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (5):1149-1160.
Experiment and Conceptual Change-Kuhn, Cognitive Science, and Conceptual Change-Continuity Through Revolutions: A Frame-Based Account of Conceptual Change During Scientific Revolutions.Nancy Nerssessian, Xiang Chen & Peter Barker - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (3):S208-S223.
An alternative to Kitcher's theory of conceptual progress and his account of the change of the Gene concept.Ingo Brigandt - 2004
Stumping For Widerker.Stewart Goetz - 1999 - Faith and Philosophy 16 (1):83-89.
Sellars, concepts, and conceptual change.Harold I. Brown - 1986 - Synthese 68 (August):275-307.
Embodied Knowledge, Conceptual Change, and the A Priori; or, Justification, Revision, and the Ways Life Could Go.Robert D. Rupert - 2016 - American Philosophical Quarterly 53 (2):169-192.
Conceptual Change: Analogies Great and Small and the Quest for Coherence.Brian Dunst & Alex Levine - 2014 - In Michael R. Matthews (ed.), International Handbook of Research in History, Philosophy and Science Teaching. Springer. pp. 1345-1361.
A Reconsideration of the Status of Newton's Laws.David J. Stump - 2011 - In Michael J. Shaffer & Michael Veber (eds.), What Place for the a Priori? Open Court. pp. 177.
Conceptual change and conceptual diversity contribute to progress in science.Paul E. Griffiths - 2015 - In Gabriele Bammer (ed.), Change! Combining Analytic Approaches with Street Wisdom. Australian National University Press. pp. 163--176.
Conceptual change in science and in science education.Nancy J. Nersessian - 1989 - Synthese 80 (1):163 - 183.
Notes toward an analysis of conceptual change.Mark Bevir - 2003 - Social Epistemology 17 (1):55 – 63.
The Problem of Conceptual Change in the Philosophy and History of Science.Theodore Arabatzis & Vasso Kindi - 2013 - In Stella Vosniadou (ed.), Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change. Routledge. pp. 343-359.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-10-18

Downloads
34 (#443,903)

6 months
2 (#1,136,865)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Preston
University of Reading

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references