Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (2):181-206 (2010)

Russell Powell
Boston University
The precautionary principle (“the Principle”) has been widely embraced as the new paradigm for contending with biological and environmental risk in the context of emerging technologies. Increasingly, it is being incorporated into domestic, supranational, and international legal regimes as part of a general overhaul of health and environmental regulation.1 Codifications of the Principle typically are vague, with their content intentionally left for scholars to debate, decision makers to interpret, and the courts to flesh out through case law. Generally speaking, the Principle holds that scientific uncertainty will not be a bar to preventive regulatory action, and that decision makers should err on the side of ..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1353/ken.0.0311
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Is the Creation of Artificial Life Morally Significant?Thomas Douglas, Russell Powell & Julian Savulescu - 2013 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 44 (4b):688-696.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
304 ( #35,550 of 2,520,847 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #270,438 of 2,520,847 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes