Disinterested Benevolence: An American Debate Over the Nature of Christian Love

Journal of Religious Ethics 14 (2):356 - 368 (1986)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This essay details the history of an important debate in American evangelical Christianity over the problem of disinterested benevolence, the common expression for Christian love during the early decades of the nineteenth century. It focuses on the thought of Jonathan Edwards and Samuel Hopkins, who differed significantly in their opinions regarding the degree to which Christian love requires self-denial. Some concluding remarks will underscore the persistence of this debate in the wider historical tradition of American theological ethics, as well as its normative importance.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Love, Christian and Diverse: A Response to Colin Grant.Edward Collins Vacek - 1996 - Journal of Religious Ethics 24 (1):29-34.
Communion and True Self-Love.Stephen Post - 1988 - Journal of Religious Ethics 16 (2):345 - 362.
Love: a history.Simon May - 2011 - New Haven: Yale University Press.
Loving nature: Eros or agape?Susan P. Bratton - 1992 - Environmental Ethics 14 (1):3-25.
Sentimentalism and the Is-Ought Problem.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 11 (3):323-352.
Hume's Alleged Success over Hutcheson.Noriaki Iwasa - 2011 - Synthesis Philosophica 26 (2):323-336.
Extensive Benevolence.John P. Reeder Jr - 1998 - Journal of Religious Ethics 26 (1):47 - 70.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
26 (#574,431)

6 months
3 (#880,460)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references