Universals

Routledge (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Things are particulars and their qualities are universals, but do universals have an existence distinct from the particular things describable by those terms? And what must be their nature if they do? This book provides a careful and assured survey of the central issues of debate surrounding universals, in particular those issues that have been a crucial part of the emergence of contemporary analytic ontology. The book begins with a taxonomy of extreme nominalist, moderate nominalist, and realist positions on properties, and outlines the way each handles the phenomena of predication, resemblance, and abstract reference. The debate about properties and philosophical naturalism is also examined. Different forms of extreme nominalism, moderate nominalism, and minimalist realism are critiqued. Later chapters defend a traditional realist view of universals and examine the objections to realism from various infinite regresses, the difficulties in stating identity conditions for properties, and problems with realist accounts of knowledge of abstract objects. In addition, the debate between Platonists and Aristotelians is examined alongside a discussion of the relationship between properties and an adequate theory of existence. The book's final chapter explores the problem of individuating particulars. The book makes accessible a difficult topic without blunting the sophistication of argument required by a more advanced readership.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,322

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The problem of universals.Charles Landesman - 1971 - New York,: Basic Books.
Universals and particulars: readings in ontology.Michael J. Loux (ed.) - 1970 - Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Three trope theories.Paweł Rojek - 2008 - Axiomathes 18 (3):359-377.
What's Wrong with Ostrich Nominalism?Howard Peacock - 2009 - Philosophical Papers 38 (2):183-217.
Arda Denkel's resemblance nominalism.D. M. Armstrong - 1991 - Philosophical Quarterly 41 (165):478-482.
The problem of universals.Joseph Agassi & Paul T. Sagal - 1975 - Philosophical Studies 28 (4):289 - 294.
Universals and properties.George Bealer - 1998 - In S. Laurence C. MacDonald (ed.), Contemporary Readings in the Foundations of Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 131.
On universals: an extensionalist alternative to Quine’s resemblance theory. [REVIEW]Nathan Stemmer - 2005 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 38 (1):75 - 90.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-06-23

Downloads
13 (#1,006,512)

6 months
8 (#352,434)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

"Bare particulars".Theodore Sider - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):387–397.
Object.Bradley Rettler & Andrew M. Bailey - 2017 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 1.
No bare particulars.Andrew M. Bailey - 2012 - Philosophical Studies 158 (1):31-41.
Universals, laws, and governance.Matthew Tugby - 2016 - Philosophical Studies 173 (5):1147-1163.
Load bare-ing particulars.Nathan Wildman - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (6):1419-1434.

View all 21 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references