Normative Failure in Blackburn's Ruling Passions

Abstract

In Ruling Passions, Simon Blackburn advances an ethical theory that welds his quasi-realism to a Humean-Smithean theory of moral sentiments. This paper concerns the latter Humean side of Blackburn's theory, specifically Blackburn's attempt to provide a normative ethical theory. This attempt largely involves getting over the tallest obstacle to any defender of Hume: the famous sensible knave problem

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Sensibility theory and conservative complancency.Peter W. Ross & Dale Turner - 2005 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86 (4):544–555.
Review: Which Passions Rule? [REVIEW]Michael Smith - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):157 - 163.
Interview - Simon Blackburn.Simon Blackburn - 2008 - The Philosophers' Magazine 40 (40):38-39.
Ruling Passions: A Theory of Practical Reason.Simon Blackburn - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (202):110-114.
On Simon Blackburn's ruling passions.Sigrun Svavarsdóttir - 2001 - Philosophical Books 108:18-26.
Précis of ruling passions. [REVIEW]Simon Blackburn - 2002 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 65 (1):122–135.
Simon Blackburn. Ruling Passions.A. D. M. Walker - 1999 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (3):301-302.
Simon Blackburn, ruling passions, oxford, clarendon press, 1998, pp. IV + 334.R. Dunn - 2001 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79 (1):127 – 128.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-20

Downloads
10 (#1,165,120)

6 months
1 (#1,510,037)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references