Abstract

Local food advocacy is a political and moral discourse that is meant to provide the foundation for understanding local food networks as sites of resistance against the norms and power of globalized industrial food-ways. In this context, the concept of the “natural” is frequently and un-critically invoked to argue for the ethical significance of participating in and advocating for local food networks. I argue that the conception of the “natural” at work is unquestioningly purity-based and is consistent with the construction of “nature” under traditional value dualism. This is problematic in that the dualistic framework serves to obscure many actual complexities within the “natural” and the “local” themselves, and in their relationships with their counterparts, the “cultural” and the “global.” Thus by leaving unquestioned certain assumptions about the meaning of the “natural” and how that meaning was constructed, local food advocacy is not as resistant as it might otherwise be. I suggest that local food advocates ought to utilize ecological and transnational feminist tools that are better able to acknowledge the complex and ever-changing character of the “natural” and the “local.”