- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Generative AI entails a credit–blame asymmetry
Sebastian Porsdam Mann, Brian D. Earp, Sven Nyholm, John Danaher, Nikolaj Møller, Hilary Bowman-Smart, Joshua Hatherley, Julian Koplin, Monika Plozza, Daniel Rodger, Peter V. Treit, Gregory Renard, John McMillan & Julian Savulescu
Nature Machine Intelligence 5 (5):472-475 (2023)
Abstract
Generative AI programs can produce high-quality written and visual content that may be used for good or ill. We argue that a credit–blame asymmetry arises for assigning responsibility for these outputs and discuss urgent ethical and policy implications focused on large-scale language models.Author Profiles
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
AI as Agency Without Intelligence: on ChatGPT, Large Language Models, and Other Generative Models.Luciano Floridi - 2023 - Philosophy and Technology 36 (1):1-7.
Netizens, Academicians, and Information Professionals' Opinions About AI With Special Reference To ChatGPT.Subaveerapandiyan A., A. Vinoth & Neelam Tiwary - 2023 - Library Philosophy and Practice (E-Journal):1-16.
Holding Large Language Models to Account.Ryan Miller - 2023 - In Berndt Müller (ed.), Proceedings of the AISB Convention. Society for the Study of Artificial Intelligence and the Simulation of Behaviour. pp. 7-14.
Distinguishing two features of accountability for AI technologies.Zoe Porter, Annette Zimmermann, Phillip Morgan, John McDermid, Tom Lawton & Ibrahim Habli - 2022 - Nature Machine Intelligence 4:734–736.
ChatGPT: Temptations of Progress.Rushabh H. Doshi, Simar S. Bajaj & Harlan M. Krumholz - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (4):6-8.
ChatGPT et similia: The potential of the new to be unlocked by the known.Gabriele Boselli - 2023 - ENCYCLOPAIDEIA 27 (65):111-114.
Where there’s no will, there’s no way.Alex Thomson, Jobst Landgrebe & Barry Smith - 2023 - Ukcolumn.
When Should Co-Authorship Be Given to AI?G. P. Transformer Jr, End X. Note, M. S. Spellchecker & Roman Yampolskiy - manuscript
Attributability, Accountability, and Implicit Bias.Robin Zheng - 2016 - In Michael Brownstein & Jennifer Saul (eds.), Implicit Bias and Philosophy, Volume 2: Moral Responsibility, Structural Injustice, and Ethics. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK. pp. 62-89.
Accountability in Artificial Intelligence: What It Is and How It Works.Claudio Novelli, Mariarosaria Taddeo & Luciano Floridi - 2023 - AI and Society 1:1-12.
Shame and Attributability.Andreas Brekke Carlsson - 2019 - In David Shoemaker (ed.), Oxford Studies in Agency and Responsibility Volume 6. Oxford University Press.
Staying Curious With Conversational AI in Psychotherapy.Michael Holohan, Alena Buyx & Amelia Fiske - 2023 - American Journal of Bioethics 23 (5):14-16.
Analytics
Added to PP
2023-06-01
Downloads
199 (#95,839)
6 months
90 (#44,326)
2023-06-01
Downloads
199 (#95,839)
6 months
90 (#44,326)
Historical graph of downloads
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-6d9b7f7c4c-sqt28 uwo