Formalization and infinity

Manuscrito 31 (1):25-43 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses some of Chateaubriand’s views on the connections between the ideas of formalization and infinity, as presented in chapters 19 and 20 of Logical Forms. We basically agree with his criticisms of the standard construal of these connections, a view we named “formal proofs as ultimate provings”, but we suggest an alternative way of picturing that connection based on some ideas of the late Wittgenstein.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Limitations of formalization.Constantine Politis - 1965 - Philosophy of Science 32 (3/4):356-360.
Aristotelian Infinity.John Bowin - 2007 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 32:233-250.
Infinity: new research frontiers.Michał Heller & W. H. Woodin (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Philosophical Achievement of Jacob Klein.Burt Hopkins - 2011 - New Yearbook for Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy 11:282-296.
Infinity: the quest to think the unthinkable.Brian Clegg - 2003 - [Berkeley, Calif.]: Publishers Group West.
Aristotle on mathematical infinity.Theokritos Kouremenos - 1995 - Stuttgart: F. Steiner. Edited by Aristotle.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-04-12

Downloads
258 (#74,854)

6 months
53 (#77,117)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

André Porto
Universidade Federal de Goiás

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Wittgenstein on rules and private language.Saul A. Kripke - 1982 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 173 (4):496-499.

Add more references