Thesis Eleven 167 (1):77-98 (2021)

This article addresses two great global challenges of the 2020s. On one hand, the accelerating climate crisis and, on the other, the deepening crisis of representation within liberal democracies. As temperatures and water levels rise, rates of popular confidence in existing democratic institutions decline. So, what is to be done? This article discusses whether sortition – the ancient Greek practice of selecting individuals for political office through lottery – could serve to mitigate both crises simultaneously. Since the 2000s, sortition has attracted growing interest among activists and academics. Recently it has been identified in countries like the UK and France as a mechanism for producing legitimate political answers to the climate challenge. However, few theoretical reflections on the potentials and perils of sortition-based climate governance have yet emerged. This article contributes to filling the gap. Based on a critique of the first successful case of sortition used to enhance national environmental policy – in Ireland in 2017–18 – we argue that sortition-based deliberation could indeed speed up meaningful climate action whilst improving the health of democratic systems. However, this positive outcome is not preordained. Success depends not only on green social movements getting behind climate sortition but also on developing flexible, context-specific designs that identify adequate solutions to a number of problems, including those of power ; expertise ; and participation.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1177/07255136211056997
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Against Elections: The Lottocratic Alternative.Alexander A. Guerrero - 2014 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 42 (2):135-178.
Deliberation Day.Bruce Ackerman & James S. Fishkin - 2002 - Journal of Political Philosophy 10 (2):129–152.
Institutions for Future Generations.Iñigo González-Ricoy & Axel Gosseries (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford, Royaume-Uni: Oxford University Press UK.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

On Two Anti-Democratic Uses of Sortition.Filimon Peonidis - 2016 - Democratic Theory 3 (2):26-45.
Climate Justice and Democracy: A Normative Approach.Mahmudul Hasan - 2018 - International Journal of Political Theory 3 (1).
Rekindling Union Democracy Through the Use of Sortition.Simon Pek - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 155 (4):1033-1051.
Democracies and Institutionalization of the Sortition: Is It Possible to Have Complementarity with Representation?Dante Avaro - 2014 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 3 (5):25-56.
Why Hybrid Bicameralism Is Not Right for Sortition.Terrill Bouricius - 2018 - Politics and Society 46 (3):435-451.
In Defence of Imperfection: An Election-Sortition Compromise.Arash Abizadeh - 2019 - In John Gastil & Erik Olin Wright (eds.), Legislature by Lot. London: pp. 249-255.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #1,075,219 of 2,533,815 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #163,468 of 2,533,815 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes