Non-domination and constituent power: Socialist republicanism versus radical democracy

Abstract

Philosophy & Social Criticism, Ahead of Print. Two of the dominant frameworks for criticizing capitalism and liberal democracy in contemporary political theory is Socialist republicanism, on the one hand, and radical democracy, on other hand. Whereas radical democratic thinkers have for decades criticized liberal democracy for being elitist, hierarchical and outright anti-popular, socialist republicans have for the last 10 years developed critiques of capitalism centred on the neo-republican idea of freedom as non-domination and proposed various arguments for workplace democracy and cooperative forms of ownership. Despite the common ambition of uncovering hierarchical relations of economic, political and social power, and creating new egalitarian and participatory modes of political organization, no systematic comparison of socialist republicanism and radical democracy exists. This paper fills this gap by comparing the different understandings of institutions and political action and their diverging historical and political relations to socialism.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,855

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-02

Downloads
3 (#1,368,549)

6 months
3 (#197,582)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Radical Republicanism and the Future of Work.Tom O'Shea - 2021 - Theory and Event 24 (4):1050-1067.
Socialist Republicanism.Tom O’Shea - 2020 - Political Theory 48 (5):548-572.
From Neo-Republicanism to Critical Republicanism.Dorothea Gädeke - 2020 - In Bruno Leipold, Karma Nabulsi & Stuart White (eds.), Radical Republicanism. Recovering the Traditions' Popular Heritage. Oxford, Vereinigtes Königreich: pp. 21-39.
In Defence of Public Ownership: A Reply to Frye.Tom O’Shea - 2020 - Political Theory 48 (5):581-587.
Eugene Debs and the Socialist Republic.Tom O’Shea - forthcoming - Political Theory:009059172210950.
Republicanism Under Scrutiny.Volker Kaul - 2016 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 42 (4-5):342-350.