Musical features emerging from a biocultural musicality

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Savage et al. make a compelling case, Mehr et al. less so, for social bonding and credible signalling, respectively, as the main adaptive function of human musicality. We express general advocacy for the former thesis, highlighting: overlap between the two; direct versus derived biological functions, and aspects of music embedded in cultural evolution, for example, departures from tonality.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On being musical: Education towards inclusion.Eve Ruddock - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (5):489-498.
On being musical: Education towards inclusion.Eve Ruddock - 2016 - Educational Philosophy and Theory:1-10.
The Misunderstanding of Music.Graham Welch - 2001 - UCL Institute of Education Press (University College London Institute of Education Press).
Wittgenstein and the understanding of music.Roger Scruton - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):1-9.
Musicality as a predictive process.Nils Kraus & Guido Hesselmann - 2021 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 44.
Musical twofoldness.Bence Nanay - 2012 - The Monist 95 (4):607-624.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-11-13

Downloads
5 (#1,510,250)

6 months
4 (#790,687)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations