Legal briefing: the new Patient Self-Determination Act

Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (2):156-167 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This issue’s “Legal Briefing” column covers recent legal developments involving the Patient Self-Determination Act . Enacted in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s Cruzan decision in 1990, the PSDA remains a seminal event in the development of U.S. bioethics public policy, but the PSDA has long been criticized as inadequate and ineffective. Finally, recent legislative and regulatory changes promise to revitalize and rejuvenate it. The PSDA has been the subject of recent articles in The Journal of Clinical Ethics.I categorize new legal developments concerning the PSDA into the following eight sections:1. Background and History2. Rules and Requirements3. Criticism and Challenges4. Failed Efforts to Amend the PSDA5. Personalize Your Care Act of 20136. New Regulations7. New Regulatory Guidance8. Expanded Enforcement

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The best place for bare-knuckled ethics.Edmund G. Howe - 2013 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 24 (1):3-10.
Respect for other selves.Craig Edwards - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (4):349-378.
Finder's fees may compromise the provider-patient relationship.Helen McGough - 1990 - IRB: Ethics & Human Research 13 (1-2):23-23.
Increasing consensus with patients and their loved ones.Edmund G. Howe - 2008 - Journal of Clinical Ethics 20 (1):3-12.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-01

Downloads
48 (#316,781)

6 months
11 (#196,102)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?