Discussion structures as tools for public deliberation

Public Understanding of Science 1 (29):76-93 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


We propose the use of discussion structures as tools for analyzing policy debates in a way that enables the increased participation of lay stakeholders. Discussion structures are argumentation-theoretical tools that can be employed to tackle three barriers that separate lay stakeholders from policy debates: difficulty, magnitude, and complexity. We exemplify the use of these tools on a debate in research policy on the question of responsibility. By making use of discussion structures, we focus on the argumentative moves performed by the parties involved in this debate. We conclude by discussing advantages and limitations of discussion structures and we trace several opportunities for further research on these instruments



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Parts of Structures.Matteo Plebani & Michele Lubrano - 2022 - Philosophia 50 (3):1277-1285.
Linguistic Structures and Economic Outcomes.Clas Weber & Astghik Mavisakalyan - 2017 - Journal of Economics Surveys 32 (3):916-939.
Housing Policy and Common Sense: An Inquiry and a Method.Albert Joseph Schorsch - 1992 - Dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago


Added to PP

223 (#95,027)

6 months
82 (#73,258)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Vincent Blok
Wageningen University and Research

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal.Heather Douglas - 2009 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Genesis and development of a scientific fact.Ludwik Fleck - 1979 - Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Edited by T. J. Trenn & R. K. Merton.
Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning.Douglas N. Walton - 1996 - Mahwah, N.J.: L. Erlbaum Associates.

View all 30 references / Add more references