“This Is Our World.” Hannah Arendt on Education

In Ann Chinnery, Nuraan Davids, Naomi Hodgson, Kai Horsthemke, Viktor Johansson, Dirk Willem Postma, Claudia W. Ruitenberg, Paul Smeyers, Christiane Thompson, Joris Vlieghe, Hanan Alexander, Joop Berding, Charles Bingham, Michael Bonnett, David Bridges, Malte Brinkmann, Brian A. Brown, Carsten Bünger, Nicholas C. Burbules, Rita Casale, M. Victoria Costa, Brian Coyne, Renato Huarte Cuéllar, Stefaan E. Cuypers, Johan Dahlbeck, Suzanne de Castell, Doret de Ruyter, Samantha Deane, Sarah J. DesRoches, Eduardo Duarte, Denise Egéa, Penny Enslin, Oren Ergas, Lynn Fendler, Sheron Fraser-Burgess, Norm Friesen, Amanda Fulford, Heather Greenhalgh-Spencer, Stefan Herbrechter, Chris Higgins, Pádraig Hogan, Katariina Holma, Liz Jackson, Ronald B. Jacobson, Jennifer Jenson, Kerstin Jergus, Clarence W. Joldersma, Mark E. Jonas, Zdenko Kodelja, Wendy Kohli, Anna Kouppanou, Heikki A. Kovalainen, Lesley Le Grange, David Lewin, Tyson E. Lewis, Gerard Lum, Niclas Månsson, Christopher Martin & Jan Masschelein (eds.), International Handbook of Philosophy of Education. Springer Verlag. pp. 39-48 (2018)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hannah Arendt is a political thinker. However, the concepts she uses in her political thinking are of a particular interest for understanding education, i.e. upbringing and teaching. Upbringing and teaching are activities. Arendt helps us to understand the political and educational impact of those activities.In the political thinking of Arendt the activities of labor, work, and action have a special meaning. In the chapter we suggest that neither upbringing nor teaching can be conceived of as labor. On the other hand, education can be seen as a form of work. However, it is a special kind of work; we call it ‘free work’. Upbringing and teaching can be seen as forms of action as well. However, the actions undertaken by children are actions under the responsibility of the teacher. This means that the ‘world-building capacity’ of these actions is limited. The limit is determined by the teacher. That’s why we speak of ‘beginning actions’.In addition to the ‘free work’ and ‘beginning actions’ of upbringing and teaching, we explore Arendt’s idea of the school as an ‘in-between space’: an institution between the private domain of the home and the public domain of the world. Within this in-between space, teachers introduce children and youngsters into the world. Introducing children and young people into the world means to acquire experience with the actions by which humans build up their world. This takes place under the responsibility of the teacher. We conclude, with Arendt, that school should be regarded as a prepolitical domain.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,423

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Between Two Betweens: Hannah Arendt and the Politics of Education.Emily Zakin - 2017 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 31 (1):119-134.
Public Space and Embodiment.James Mensch - 2012 - Studia Phaenomenologica 12:211-226.
Vita Mundi.Lena Zuckerwise - 2016 - Social Theory and Practice 42 (3):474-500.
Hannah Arendt: politics, history and citizenship.Phillip Birger Hansen - 1993 - Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
A common world? Arendt, Castoriadis and political creation.Ingerid S. Straume - 2012 - European Journal of Social Theory 15 (3):367-383.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-17

Downloads
10 (#1,168,820)

6 months
1 (#1,516,429)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references