Critical Notes on Servius’ Commentary on Virgil (Serv. On Aen. 11.741; Ecl. 2.58; Ecl. 4.4)

Classical Quarterly 72 (2):868-876 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses three textual problems in Servius’ commentary on Virgil (Serv. on Aen. 11.741; Ecl. 2.58; Ecl. 4.4). In two notes a new conjecture is proposed; in one passage a transmitted reading, so far neglected by earlier editors, is supported.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,596

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Virgil commentary of Servius.Don Fowler - 2006 - In Andrew Laird (ed.), Ancient Literary Criticism. Oxford University Press.
Terence Quotations in Servius Auctus.J. D. Craig - 1931 - Classical Quarterly 25 (3-4):151-.
More on Donatus' Commentary on Virgil.J. J. Savage - 1929 - Classical Quarterly 23 (1):56-59.
Terence Quotations in Servius.J. D. Craig - 1930 - Classical Quarterly 24 (3-4):183-.
Serv. Ecl. 6. 3: en torno de la paráfrasis cum canere vellem.María Eugenia Romero - 2012 - Argos (Universidad Simón Bolívar) 35 (2):75-91.
Virgil, Aeneid 2. 567–88.R. G. Austin - 1961 - Classical Quarterly 11 (3-4):185-.
Transposition at Virgil, Aeneid 8.612–13.Jonathan Nathan - 2023 - Classical Quarterly 73 (2):937-940.

Analytics

Added to PP
2023-07-30

Downloads
10 (#1,447,236)

6 months
6 (#718,774)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Die Hirten auf dem Felde.J. Geffcken - 1914 - Hermes 49 (3):321-351.
Textkritisches Zu Servius.V. Bulhart - 1953 - Mnemosyne 6 (1):64-65.

Add more references