A place for dogs and trees?

PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 12 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Rosenberg does not provide arguments for some crucial premises in his argument against physicalism. In particular, he gives no independent argument to show that physicalists must accept the entry-by-entailment thesis. The arguments provided establish weaker premises than those that are needed. As a consequence, Rosenberg.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Game Trees For Decision Analysis.Prakash P. Shenoy - 1998 - Theory and Decision 44 (2):149-171.
Logical Consequence.J. C. Beall, Greg Restall & Gil Sagi - 2019 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Evidentialism and skeptical arguments.Dylan Dodd - 2012 - Synthese 189 (2):337-352.
Logic for dogs.Andrew Aberdein - 2008 - In Steven D. Hales (ed.), What Philosophy Can Tell You About Your Dog. Open Court. pp. 167-181.
Causal theories of mental content.Fred Adams & Ken Aizawa - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
On Scott and Karp trees of uncountable models.Tapani Hyttinen & Jouko Väänänen - 1990 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 55 (3):897-908.
Peacocke’s trees.Boyd Millar - 2010 - Synthese 174 (3):445-461.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
488 (#36,542)

6 months
4 (#678,769)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Polger
University of Cincinnati

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations