Technology and the wilderness experience

Environmental Ethics 28 (2):147-163 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

As mechanical devices become lighter, sleeker, and cheaper, the issue of technology in wilderness becomes an increasingly more important ethical concern because many high-tech luxuries or devices stand to separate the backcountry traveler from the very goals he or she hopes to actualize by recreating in wilderness. As recreationists, we need to determine which items are essential and which aredistracting, separating important “equipment” from needless “devices,” and exercising the self-control to carry only what we need. This process can be called “responsible simplicity.” It is in the backcountry traveler’s best interest to exercise responsible simplicity, to choose only the devices necessary to actualize the telos, or goal, of one’s wilderness experience. A critique of the appropriateness of technology in the backcountry should entail examining devices in their context and also by their relationship to other technologies brought into the backcountry. From a virtue ethics standpoint, responsible simplicity can promote the integrity of wilderness recreation by providing oversight with regard to what goods are internal to the practice. It can also allow room for “wilderness” in our everyday lives in association with David Strong’s notion of “counterbalancing” and Albert Borgmann’s notions of “eloquent reality” and “focal practices.”

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,509

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Possibility of Managing for Wilderness.David Graham Henderson - 2009 - Environmental Ethics 31 (4):413-429.
On Wilderness and People: A View From Mount Marcy.Wayne Ouderkirk - 2003 - Philosophy and Geography 6 (1):15 – 32.
What “Wilderness” in Frontier Ecosystems?J. Baird Callicott - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (3):235-249.
Ethics in the Woods.Karen Syse - 2001 - Ethics, Place and Environment 4 (3):226 – 234.
Wilderness and the Bantu Mind.G. W. Burnett & Kamuyu Wa Kang’Ethe - 1994 - Environmental Ethics 16 (2):145-160.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
39 (#296,934)

6 months
4 (#172,016)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality.Peter Railton - 1984 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 13 (2):134-171.
A Study in Moral Theory.John Laird - 1926 - Humana Mente 1 (3):385-388.

Add more references