Pragmatics and Cognition 13 (2):297-336 (2005)
AbstractThis paper presents a model of persuasion in terms of goals and beliefs. Among the various ways to influence people, that is, to raise or lower the likelihood for them to pursue some goal, ranging from threat to suggestion, persuasion is viewed as a case of communicative non-coercive goal hooking. A persuader leads a persuadee to pursue some goal out of a free choice, i.e., by convincing him/her that the proposed goal is useful for some other goal that the persuadee already has. It is argued that the Aristotelian persuasive strategies of logos, ethos and pathos (rational argumentation, the speaker¿s credibility and reliability, and the appeal to emotion) are always present in every persuasive discourse, and that they are exploited to raise the value of the goal proposed and to strengthen the believability of the link between it and the persuadee¿s previous goals. The paper proposes an analysis of discourse in terms of a hierarchy of goals as a tool to single out these strategies within the discourse structure. By applying this model to different kinds of persuasive messages (political discourse, advertising, dialogues in the health domain), it shows how, in the fragments presented, this kind of analysis allows to clarify the relationships between the persuader¿s and the persuadee¿s goals and to elucidate how much and how directly the persuader appeals to logos, ethos and pathos in his/her discourse
Similar books and articles
W Hat is a Goal? How Do People Pursue Goals? The Answers to These Questions May Seem Obvious Because People Have a Lifetime of Experience at Setting Goals, Pursuing Goals, Disengaging From Some Goals, and Attaining Others. One's History of Experience with Goals, However, Does Not Mean That One has an Accurate Understanding of Where Goals Come From, How the Mind Represents Them, or How One Goes About Pursuing the Aims That Are so Central to One's Sense of Personal Fulfillment.Gordon B. Moskowitz - 2012 - In Henk Aarts & Andrew J. Elliot (eds.), Goal-Directed Behavior. Psychology Press.
Deliberation Versus Dispute: The Impact of Argumentative Discourse Goals on Learning and Reasoning in the Science Classroom.Mark Felton, Merce Garcia-Mila & Sandra Gilabert - 2009 - Informal Logic 29 (4):417-446.
Symposium on Rationality and Commitment: Introduction.Fabienne Peter & Hans Bernhard Schmid - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):1-3.
And Lead Us (Not) Into Persuasion…? Persuasive Technology and the Ethics of Communication.Andreas Spahn - 2012 - Science and Engineering Ethics 18 (4):633-650.
Goals in Their Setting: A Normative Analysis of Goal Setting in Physical Rehabilitation.Rita Struhkamp - 2004 - Health Care Analysis 12 (2):131-155.
The Goals of Medicine. Towards a Unified Theory.Bengt Brülde - 2001 - Health Care Analysis 9 (1):1-13.
Arguing Without Trying to Persuade? Elements for a Non-Persuasive Definition of Argumentation.Raphaël Micheli - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):115-126.
Preaching to the Converted. Why Argue When Everyone Agrees?Marianne Doury - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (1):99-114.
Utopian Goals: Four Objections and a Cautious Defense.Karin Edvardsson Björnberg - 2008 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 15 (1):139-154.
The Goals of Public Health: An Integrated, Multidimensional Model.Christian Munthe - 2008 - Public Health Ethics 1 (1):39-52.
Rational Goal-Setting in Environmental Policy : Foundations and Applications.Karin Edvardsson Björnberg - unknown
Ethical Organisational Culture as a Context for Managers' Personal Work Goals.Mari Huhtala, Taru Feldt, Katriina Hyvönen & Saija Mauno - 2013 - Journal of Business Ethics 114 (2):265-282.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Role of Beliefs in Goal Dynamics: Prolegomena to a Constructive Theory of Intentions.Cristiano Castelfranchi & Fabio Paglieri - 2007 - Synthese 155 (2):237-263.
“The Bitter Laughter”. When Parody Is a Moral and Affective Priming in Political Persuasion.Francesca D’Errico & Isabella Poggi - 2016 - Frontiers in Psychology 7.
The Epistemic Value of Emotions.Benedetta Romano - 2019 - Dissertation, Ludwig Maximilians Universität, München
Ignorance-Unmasking Questions in the Royal–Sarkozy Presidential Debate: A Resource to Claim Epistemic Authority.Andrzej Zuczkowski, Ilaria Riccioni, Ramona Bongelli & Laura Vincze - 2016 - Discourse Studies 18 (4):430-453.
References found in this work
No references found.