A Critical Overview of the Most Recent Logics of Grounding

In Francesca Boccuni & Andrea Sereni (eds.), Objectivity, Realism, and Proof. FilMat Studies in the Philosophy of Mathematics. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper our aim is twofold: on the one hand, to present in a clear and faithful way two recent contributions to the logic of grounding, namely Correia, and Fine ; on the other hand, to argue that some of the formal principles describing the notion of grounding proposed by these logics need to be changed and improved.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Recent work on grounding.Michael J. Clark & David Liggins - 2012 - Analysis Reviews 72 (4):812-823.
Against Grounding Necessitarianism.Alexander Skiles - 2015 - Erkenntnis 80 (4):717-751.
Truth‐Grounding and Transitivity.Tuomas E. Tahko - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (4):332-340.
Grounding: necessary or contingent?Kelly Trogdon - 2013 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 94 (4):465-485.
Roadmap for preferential logics.Dov M. Gabbay & Karl Schlechta - 2009 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 19 (1):43-95.
Social Construction and Grounding.Aaron M. Griffith - 2017 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 97 (2):393-409.
Translation Methods for Non-Classical Logics: An Overview.Hans Ohlbach - 1993 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 1 (1):69-89.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-01-28

Downloads
28 (#555,203)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Francesca Poggiolesi
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references