Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):40-50 (2010)
AbstractContext: The debate around and about constructivism in German-language communication studies. Problem: The reception of constructivism in German-language communication studies exhibits all the features of an instructive lesson: it makes clear how an academic field reacts, and how it can react, to the introduction of specific theories. Moreover, this case highlights the persistent virulent fundamental conflict between realist and relativist epistemologies in conjunction with a matching catalogue of accusations raised – whether rightly or wrongly – towards all those representatives of communication studies that have adopted a constructivist approach making use of constructivist arguments. Method: By reconstructing the debate as precisely as possible it is mapped onto the fundamental problems of the conception of constructivist theory. Results: It is demonstrated that the depicted reservations and accusations can essentially be mapped onto three fundamental problems of constructivist theory development. 1. The problem of practice-relevance. The central question is how the relationship between (constructivist) epistemology and everyday practice ought to be spelled out in concrete terms, because this very relationship is the source of many worries (“Constructivism undermines the journalistic ideal of objectivity,” etc.). 2. The problem of self-contradiction. It is essentially represented by the question of how one ought to present and promote a relativist epistemology – without at the same time, explicitly or implicitly, introducing absolute claims of validity that contradict one’s own initial premises. 3. The problem of terminological imprecision and referential confusion: concepts and terms such as “truth,” “reality” and “objective knowledge” are used in many different ways. It is not always clear whether an author wants to refer to an absolute reality or whether he or she is talking about a concept that is admittedly created within given frontiers of knowledge
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Between Realism and Constructivism? Luhmann's Ambivalent Epistemological Standpoint.A. Scholl - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):5-12.
How Constructivist Philosophy Enriches Journalism Research. Review of “The Creation of Reality: A Constructivist Epistemology of Journalism and Journalism Education” by Bernhard Poerksen.A. Scholl - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):275-277.
On the Role of Constructivism in Mathematical Epistemology.A. Quale - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):104-111.
Radical Constructivism in Communication Science.A. Scholl - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):51-57.
Physics Develops Unaffected by Constructivism.Helmut Schwegler - 2001 - Foundations of Science 6 (4):241-253.
Radical Constructivism Mainstreaming: A Desirable Endeavor? Critical Considerations Using Examples From Educational Studies and Learning Theory.T. Hug - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):58-65.
The Many Faces of Mathematical Constructivism.B. Kerkhove & J. P. Bendegem - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (2):97-103.
Constructivist Criteria for Organising and Designing Educational Research: How Might an Educational Research Inquiry Be Judged From a Constructivist Perspective?S. J. Kemp - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):118-125.
What Can We Learn From the Misunderstandings of Radical Constructivism? Commentary on Slezak's “Radical Constructivism: Epistemology, Education and Dynamite”.D. I. Dykstra - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):120-126.
From Objects to Processes: A Proposal to Rewrite Radical Constructivism.S. J. Schmidt - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 7 (1):1-47.
Niklas Luhmann and the Sociological Turn in Constructivism.A. Riegler & A. Scholl - 2012 - Constructivist Foundations 8 (1):1-4.
Exile on Mainstream. Constructivism in Psychotherapy and Suggestions From a Kellian Perspective.V. Kenny - 2010 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (1):65-76.
The Science Wars Go Local: The Reception of Radical Constructivism in Quebec.M. Larochelle & J. Désautels - 2011 - Constructivist Foundations 6 (2):248-253.