Historiography and enlightenment: A view of their history: J. G. A. Pocock

Modern Intellectual History 5 (1):83-96 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX


This essay is written on the following premises and argues for them. “Enlightenment” is a word or signifier, and not a single or unifiable phenomenon which it consistently signifies. There is no single or unifiable phenomenon describable as “the Enlightenment,” but it is the definite article rather than the noun which is to be avoided. In studying the intellectual history of the late seventeenth century and the eighteenth, we encounter a variety of statements made, and assumptions proposed, to which the term “Enlightenment” may usefully be applied, but the meanings of the term shift as we apply it. The things are connected, but not continuous; they cannot be reduced to a single narrative; and we find ourselves using the word “Enlightenment” in a family of ways and talking about a family of phenomena, resembling and related to one another in a variety of ways that permit of various generalizations about them. We are not, however, committed to a single root meaning of the word “Enlightenment,” and we do not need to reduce the phenomena of which we treat to a single process or entity to be termed “the” Enlightenment. It is a reification that we wish to avoid, but the structure of our language is such that this is difficult, and we will find ourselves talking of “the French” or “the Scottish,” “the Newtonian” or the “the Arminian” Enlightenments, and hoping that by employing qualifying adjectives we may constantly remind ourselves that the keyword “Enlightenment” is ours to use and should not master us.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 83,836

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On the practical enlightenment.You Zhanshi - 2001 - Philosophy and Culture 28 (11):1034-1056.
“An Examination of the Role of Women in the Enlightenment”.Dongwoo Kim - 2013 - Constellations (University of Alberta Student Journal) 4 (2).
Defending the Radical Enlightenment.Charles W. Mills - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:9-29.
Isaiah Berlin and the Enlightenment.Laurence Brockliss & Ritchie Robertson (eds.) - 2016 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press UK.
Enlightenment: The crisis and transformation of the concept.Mile Savic - 2006 - Filozofija I Društvo 2006 (30):9-29.
Enlightenment shadows.Genevieve Lloyd - 2013 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

140 (#104,763)

6 months
7 (#129,764)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jeffrey Pocock
University of London

References found in this work

Add more references