On Adrian Johnston's Materialist Psychoanalysis: Some Questions

Southern Journal of Philosophy 51 (S1):85-93 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this commentary on Adrian Johnston's paper, “Drive Between Brain and Subject: An Immanent Critique of Lacanian Neuropsychoanalysis,” I consider whether his attempt to develop a materialist ground for psychoanalysis can avoid versions of reductionism and verificationism that would threaten any autonomy psychoanalysis might have as a science

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Psychoanalysis, fascism, and fundamentalism.Julia Borossa & Ivan Ward (eds.) - 2009 - Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Culture and the unconscious.Caroline Bainbridge (ed.) - 2007 - New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Reason and unreason: psychoanalysis, science, and politics.Michael Rustin - 2001 - Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.
Hegel. [REVIEW]Adrian Johnston - 2004 - The Owl of Minerva 36 (1):68-74.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-08-01

Downloads
83 (#193,031)

6 months
4 (#573,918)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Ed Pluth
California State University, Chico

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations