Antipositivist Arguments from Legal Thought and Talk: The Metalinguistic Response

In Graham Hubbs & Douglas Lind (eds.), Pragmatism, Law, and Language. New York: Routledge. pp. 56-75 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

What metalinguistic negotiations can't do.Teresa Marques - 2017 - Phenomenology and Mind (12):40-48.
Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.
Legal positivism.Mario Jori (ed.) - 1992 - New York, NY: New York University Press.
Legal positivism: Still descriptive and morally neutral.Andrei Marmor - 2006 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26 (4):683-704.
The autonomy of law: essays on legal positivism.Robert P. George (ed.) - 1996 - New York: Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-09-24

Downloads
132 (#140,053)

6 months
91 (#52,253)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tim Sundell
University of Kentucky
David Plunkett
Dartmouth College

Citations of this work

Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.
How to have a metalinguistic dispute.Poppy Mankowitz - 2021 - Synthese 199 (3-4):5603-5622.
Must we measure what we mean?Nat Hansen - 2017 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 60 (8):785-815.

View all 19 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references