- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Wittgenstein and the idea of a critical social theory: a critique of Giddens, Habermas, and Bhaskar
New York: Routledge (1999)
Abstract
This book uses the philosophy of Wittgenstein as a perspective from which to challenge the idea of a critical social theory, represented pre-eminently by Giddens, Habermas and Bhaskar.Author's Profile
Links
PhilArchive
External links
(no proxy)
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Through your library
- Sign in / register and customize your OpenURL resolver
- Configure custom resolver
My notes
Similar books and articles
Aesthetics, play, and cultural memory: Giddens and Habermas on the postmodern challenge.Kenneth H. Tucker - 1993 - Sociological Theory 11 (2):194-211.
Kritische Sprechakttheorie oder Semiotik der Macht? Habermas und die Wittgenstein-Tradition.Herbert Kögler - 1996 - Wittgenstein-Studien 3 (1).
Autonomy and tradition: a critique of the sociological and philosophical foundations of giddens’s utopian realism.Steven Groarke - 2004 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 7 (3):34-51.
Can social systems be autopoietic? Bhaskar's and Giddens' social theories.John Mingers - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (4):403–427.
The epistemological argument against socialism: A Wittgensteinian critique of Hayek and Giddens.Nigel Pleasants - 1997 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 40 (1):23 – 45.
The Accidental Derogation of the Lay Actor: A Critique of Giddens’s Concept of Structure.Anthony King - 2000 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 30 (3):362-383.
Social Theory in the Twentieth Century and Beyond.Patrick Baert - 2010 - Polity. Edited by Filipe Carreira Silvdaa.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
47 (#331,642)
6 months
12 (#202,587)
2009-01-28
Downloads
47 (#331,642)
6 months
12 (#202,587)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
The Ethics of Conceptualization: A Needs-Based Approach.Matthieu Queloz - forthcoming - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams’s Debt to Wittgenstein.Matthieu Queloz & Nikhil Krishnan - forthcoming - In Marcel van Ackeren & Matthieu Queloz (eds.), Bernard Williams on Philosophy and History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Left Wittgensteinianism.Matthieu Queloz & Damian Cueni - 2021 - European Journal of Philosophy 29 (4):758-777.
The relevance of ontological commitments in social sciences: Realist and pragmatist viewpoints.Osmo Kivinen & Tero Piiroinen - 2004 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 34 (3):231–248.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo