Learning to Live with Drones: Answering Jeremy Waldron and the Neutralist Critique

Journal of Military Ethics 14 (2):128-145 (2015)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACTAmong the most forceful and provocative criticisms that have been leveled at US drone strikes against alleged terrorists far from conventional battlefields has been Jeremy Waldron's charge that they cannot be justified in terms of a neutral principle that most reasonable people would accept. In essence, Waldron asks ‘whether we are comfortable with [such a norm] in the hands of our enemies’. He thinks most people will say ‘no’ and that this is a reason not to embrace a permissive norm in the first place. We will argue that a key assumption in Waldron's argument is highly contestable, and that if it is challenged, the whole argument can be turned inside out to provide support for a limited drone program aimed at terrorist leaders. In essence, if the suspected terrorists who are the targets of drone strikes are understood to be combatants rather than civilians, as the US government has forcefully argued that they should be, then the norm permitting strikes against them is the humanitarian principle..

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,907

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Law and Morality at War.Adil Ahmad Haque - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):79-97.
Dignity, Rank, and Rights.Jeremy Waldron - 2012 - New York, US: Oup Usa.
Law and disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1999 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Professor Waldron Goes to Washington.Susan Mendus - 2014 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 8 (1):123-134.
Jeremy Waldron on law and disagreement.David Estlund - 2000 - Philosophical Studies 99 (1):111-128.
The dignity of legislation.Jeremy Waldron - 1999 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liberal Rights: Collected Papers, 1981-1991. [REVIEW]Carole Pateman - 1995 - Philosophical Review 104 (2):301-303.
Is compulsory voting justified?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Public Reason 1 (1):57-74.
Constitutions as Living Trees: An Idiot Defends.Wil Waluchow - 2005 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 18 (2):207-247.
Is judicial review undemocratic?Annabelle Lever - 2009 - Perspectives on Politics 7 (4):897-915.
Reflections on Waldron’s Archetypes.Michael Plaxton - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (1):77-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-08-26

Downloads
15 (#971,366)

6 months
3 (#1,037,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Avery Plaw
University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2004 - Ethics 114 (4):693-733.
The ethics of killing in war.Jeff McMahan - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (1):693-733.

Add more references