Is the Other radically ‘other’? A critical reconstruction of Levinas’ ethics

Philosophy and Social Criticism 38 (9):977-995 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Many Levinasians are prone to merely assert or presuppose that the Other is ‘radically Other’, and that such Otherness is of patent ethical significance. But building ethics into the very concept of ‘the Other’ seems question-begging. What then, if not mere Otherness, might motivate Levinasian responsibility? In the following discussion I argue that this can best be answered by reading Levinas as a post-Holocaust thinker, preoccupied with how one’s simply being-here constitutes a ‘usurpation of spaces belonging to the other’. Then, drawing on Schutz’s phenomenology, I explain how the resultant usurpatory bad conscience presupposes the embodied ‘interchangeability’ of self and Other. As such, one can be said to ‘usurp’ the Other’s place only insofar as self and Other are not radically different.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,283

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The primacy of ethics: Hobbes and Levinas. [REVIEW]Cheryl L. Hughes - 1998 - Continental Philosophy Review 31 (1):79-94.
An other face of ethics in Levinas.Barbara Jane Davy - 2007 - Ethics and the Environment 12 (1):39-66.
Rebuilding the feminine in Levinas's talmudic Readings.Hanoch Ben Pazi - 2003 - Journal of Jewish Thought and Philosophy 12 (3):1-32.
The Primacy of Disruption in Levinas Account of Transcendence.Kris Sealey - 2010 - Research in Phenomenology 40 (3):363-377.
The impossibility of corporate ethics: For a Levinasian approach to managerial ethics.David Bevan & Hervé Corvellec - 2007 - Business Ethics, the Environment and Responsibility 16 (3):208–219.
The drama of being: Levinas and the history of philosophy.John Caruana - 2006 - Continental Philosophy Review 40 (3):251-273.
Welcoming dogs: Levinas and 'the animal' question.Bob Plant - 2011 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 37 (1):49-71.
Levinas and Our Moral Responsibility Toward Other Animals.Peter Atterton - 2011 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 54 (6):633 - 649.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-10-17

Downloads
83 (#203,885)

6 months
7 (#439,668)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Bob Plant
University of Aberdeen (PhD)

Citations of this work

Fair Trade and the Fetishization of Levinasian Ethics.Juan Ignacio Staricco - 2016 - Journal of Business Ethics 138 (1):1-16.

Add more citations