Authors
J. Brian Pitts
Cambridge University
Abstract
Change seems missing in Hamiltonian General Relativity's observables. The typical definition takes observables to have $0$ Poisson bracket with \emph{each} first-class constraint. Another definition aims to recover Lagrangian-equivalence: observables have $0$ Poisson bracket with the gauge generator $G$, a \emph{tuned sum} of first-class constraints. Empirically equivalent theories have equivalent observables. That platitude provides a test of definitions using de Broglie's massive electromagnetism. The non-gauge ``Proca'' formulation has no first-class constraints, so everything is observable. The gauge ``Stueckelberg'' formulation has first-class constraints, so observables vary with the definition. Which satisfies the platitude? The team definition does; the individual definition does not. Subsequent work using the gravitational analog has shown that observables have not a 0 Poisson bracket, but a Lie derivative for the Poisson bracket with the gauge generator $G$. The same should hold for General Relativity, so observables change locally and correspond to 4-dimensional tensor calculus. Thus requiring equivalent observables for empirically equivalent formulations helps to address the problem of time.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,436
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Infinite.Adrian W. Moore - 1990 - Routledge.
The Epistemology of Geometry.Clark Glymour - 1977 - Noûs 11 (3):227-251.
Change in Hamiltonian General Relativity From the Lack of a Time-Like Killing Vector Field.J. Brian Pitts - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:68-89.
The Infinite.A. W. MOORE - 1990 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 182 (3):355-357.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Change in Hamiltonian General Relativity From the Lack of a Time-Like Killing Vector Field.J. Brian Pitts - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:68-89.
Unreal Observables.Bryan W. Roberts - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1265-1274.
Toward an Understanding of Parochial Observables.Benjamin Feintzeig - 2018 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 69 (1):161-191.
On the Observables on Quantum Logics.S. Pulmannová - 1981 - Foundations of Physics 11 (1-2):127-136.
Observables on Hypergraphs.S. P. Gudder & G. T. Rüttimann - 1986 - Foundations of Physics 16 (8):773-790.
A General Perspective On Time Observables.Bryan W. Roberts - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 47:50-54.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-07-18

Total views
12 ( #812,941 of 2,520,354 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #205,232 of 2,520,354 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes