The cross-disciplinary ethical responsibilities of psychology faculty

Ethics and Behavior 4 (3):199 – 208 (1994)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article discusses the ethical responsibilities that psychology faculty have when psychological information is seriously misrepresented or psychological techniques are misued by nonpsychology faculty. General values derived from the American Psychological Association's (APA) ethical principles are identified and reviewed. The APA ethical code recommends that psychologists limit the misrepresentation of psychological information and protect students from the misuse of psychological techniques. Examples from my experience are presented to illustrate these ethical principles and responsibilities.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Ethics in psychology and the mental health professions: standards and cases.Gerald P. Koocher - 2008 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Patricia Keith-Spiegel.
Ethics in psychotherapy and counseling: a practical guide for psychologists.Kenneth S. Pope - 1991 - San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Edited by Melba Jean Trinidad Vasquez.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
22 (#688,104)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Psychological Types.C. G. Jung & H. Godwin Baynes - 1923 - Journal of Philosophy 20 (23):636-640.

Add more references