The Abuses of Argument: Understanding Fallacies on Toulmin’s Layout of Argument

Informal Logic 33 (4):531-546 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper provides a preliminary account of fallacies on Toulmin’s model of argument, one that improves upon previous attempts to understand fallacies on this argument scheme. To do this Johnson and Blair’s taxonomy of three basic fallacies is examined using Toulmin’s layout.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,202

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Uses of Argument in Mathematics.Andrew Aberdein - 2005 - Argumentation 19 (3):287-301.
Toulmin’s “Analytic Arguments”.Ben Hamby - 2012 - Informal Logic 32 (1):116-131.
Fallacies.Robert J. Fogelin & Timothy J. Duggan - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):255-262.
Fallacies and Argument Appraisal.Christopher W. Tindale - 2007 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Vices of Argument.Andrew Aberdein - 2016 - Topoi 35 (2):413-422.
What is a Sophistical Refutation?David Botting - 2012 - Argumentation 26 (2):213-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-12-04

Downloads
35 (#433,400)

6 months
3 (#902,269)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references