Prototypes as compositional components of concepts

Synthese 193 (9):2899–2927 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to reconcile two claims that have long been thought to be incompatible: that we compositionally determine the meaning of complex expressions from the meaning of their parts, and that prototypes are components of the meaning of lexical terms such as fish, red, and gun. Hypotheses and are independently plausible, but most researchers think that reconciling them is a difficult, if not hopeless task. In particular, most linguists and philosophers agree that is not negotiable; so they tend to reject. Recently, there have been some attempts to reconcile these claims, but they all adopt an implausibly weak notion of compositionality. Furthermore, parties to this debate tend to fall into a problematic way of individuating prototypes that is too externalistic. In contrast, I propose that we can reconcile and if we adopt, instead, an internalist and pluralist conception of prototypes and a context-sensitive but strong notion of compositionality. I argue that each of this proposals is independently plausible, and that, when taken together, provide the basis for a satisfactory account of prototype compositionality.

Similar books and articles

Hybrid Extensional Prototype Compositionality.Jussi Jylkkä - 2011 - Minds and Machines 21 (1):41-56.
What compositionality still can do.Philip Robbins - 2001 - Philosophical Quarterly 51 (204):328-336.
What is wrong with prototypes.Peter Földiák - 1998 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (4):471-472.
Inferentialism, compositionality and the thickness of meaning.Dongho Choi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:335-344.
Learnability and compositionality.Douglas Patterson - 2005 - Mind and Language 20 (3):326–352.
Prototype theory and compositionality.H. Kamp & B. Partee - 1995 - Cognition 57 (2):129-191.
Prototypes and their Composition from an Evolutionary Point of View.G. Schurz - 2012 - In Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality. Oxford University Press. pp. 530--553.
Pure quotation and general compositionality.Peter Pagin & Dag Westerståhl - 2010 - Linguistics and Philosophy 33 (5):381-415.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-09-10

Downloads
847 (#15,843)

6 months
239 (#8,544)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?