- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
Incompleteness and incomparability in preference aggregation: Complexity results
Artificial Intelligence 175 (7-8):1272-1289 (2011)
Abstract
This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)My notes
Similar books and articles
Arrow's theorem in judgment aggregation.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2007 - Social Choice and Welfare 29 (1):19-33.
The Theory of Judgment Aggregation: An Introductory Review.Christian List - 2010 - LSE Choice Group Working Paper Series 6 (1).
The Theory of Judgment Aggregation: An Introductory Review.Christian List - 2010 - LSE Choice Group Working Paper Series 6 (1).
Complexity results for preference aggregation over (m)CP-nets: Pareto and majority voting.Thomas Lukasiewicz & Enrico Malizia - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 272 (C):101-142.
Sympathy, commitment, and preference.Daniel M. Hausman - 2005 - Economics and Philosophy 21 (1):33-50.
The theory of judgment aggregation: an introductory review.Christian List - 2012 - Synthese 187 (1):179-207.
Information aggregation and preference heterogeneity in committees.Elisabeth Schulte - 2010 - Theory and Decision 69 (1):97-118.
Value Incomparability and Incommensurability.Ruth Chang - 2015 - In Iwao Hirose & Jonas Olson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Value Theory. Oxford University Press.
Impossibility Results for Infinite-Electorate Abstract Aggregation Rules.Frederik Herzberg & Daniel Eckert - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 41 (1):273-286.
Complexity of Judgment Aggregation.Ulle Endriss, Umberto Grandi & Daniele Porello - 2012 - Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 45:481--514.
Probabilistic Opinion Pooling Generalized. Part One: General Agendas.Franz Dietrich & Christian List - 2017 - Social Choice and Welfare 48 (4):747–786.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-12-22
Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
2020-12-22
Downloads
3 (#1,650,745)
6 months
3 (#902,269)
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Distributed monitoring of election winners.Arnold Filtser & Nimrod Talmon - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 276 (C):79-104.
On the evaluation of election outcomes under uncertainty.Noam Hazon, Yonatan Aumann, Sarit Kraus & Michael Wooldridge - 2012 - Artificial Intelligence 189 (C):1-18.
Optimizing positional scoring rules for rank aggregation.Ioannis Caragiannis, Xenophon Chatzigeorgiou, George A. Krimpas & Alexandros A. Voudouris - 2019 - Artificial Intelligence 267 (C):58-77.
Complexity of and algorithms for the manipulation of Borda, Nanson's and Baldwin's voting rules.Jessica Davies, George Katsirelos, Nina Narodytska, Toby Walsh & Lirong Xia - 2014 - Artificial Intelligence 217 (C):20-42.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-5tf24 uwo