Considering Stanley Hauerwas

Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (2):193-201 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

After introducing the five articles that comprise this focus issue, I consider Hauerwas's claim that he is a theologian without a position. The claim has merit, I hold, since Hauerwas writes in response to what he reads, which is his way of learning it better. Moreover, he writes socially, characteristically soliciting help from his friends. As such, he purposefully makes himself accountable to those he addresses. In his later years this accountability has extended especially to the Church and to the Bible, which helps explain why Hauerwas cares so deeply about his sermons, which he takes to be his most important work

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Hauerwas and political theology: The next generation. [REVIEW]Charles Pinches - 2008 - Journal of Religious Ethics 36 (3):513-542.
The Hauerwas reader.Stanley Hauerwas - 2001 - Durham, NC: Duke University Press. Edited by John Berkman & Michael G. Cartwright.
Conversations with Carney and Hauerwas.William K. Frankena - 1975 - Journal of Religious Ethics 3 (1):45-62.
The Virtue of Obedience.Phillip L. Quinn - 1998 - Faith and Philosophy 15 (4):445-461.
The Moral Imagination and the Shaping Power of the Parables.Benedict M. Guevin - 1989 - Journal of Religious Ethics 17 (1):63 - 79.
Hauerwas among the virtues.Jennifer A. Herdt - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (2):202-227.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-23

Downloads
132 (#135,367)

6 months
3 (#1,023,809)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations