Treating or Killing? The Divergent Moral Implications of Cardiac Device Deactivation

Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 45 (1):28-41 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this article, I argue that there is a moral difference between deactivating an implantable cardioverter defibrillator and turning off a cardiac pacemaker. It is, at least in most cases, morally permissible to deactivate an ICD. It is not, at least in most cases, morally permissible to turn off a pacemaker in a fully or significantly pacemaker-dependent patient. After describing the relevant medical technologies—pacemakers and ICDs—I continue with contrasting perspectives on the issue of deactivation from practitioners involved with these devices: physicians, nurses, and allied professionals. Next, I offer a few possible analyses of the situation, relying on recent work in medical ethics. Considerations of intention, responsibility, and replacement support my distinguishing between ICDs and CPs. I conclude by recommending a change in policy of one of the leading cardiac societies.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Deactivating Pacemakers at the End of Life.Benedict M. Guevin - 2015 - The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly 15 (1):39-51.
The Total Artificial Heart and the Dilemma of Deactivation.Ben Bronner - 2016 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (4):347-367.
The ethics of implantable devices.E. B. Wu - 2007 - Journal of Medical Ethics 33 (9):532-533.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-12-31

Downloads
13 (#1,010,467)

6 months
5 (#629,136)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?