Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 34 (1):181-200 (2014)
AbstractThis review article offers a European perspective on the pluralistic, principles-based model of intellectual property (IP) advanced by Robert Merges in his book Justifying Intellectual Property. After introducing Merges’s model and theory of IP with reference to IP theories generally, other pluralistic legal models, and patterns of judicial reasoning in the patent and copyright fields, the article argues that European jurisprudence offers broad support for Merges’s operational model of IP, while also challenging certain aspects of his wider analysis. They include his ‘one size fits all’ foundational theory of IP, his account of key IP rules and practices, and his choice and conception of IP’s midlevel principles. Through this critique the article draws attention to the utilitarian bias of Merges’s model; a bias which undermines its pluralistic claims, in part by undermining Merges’s own foundational theory of IP. The result is to underline the limits of a regime unconcerned with its own normative basis, and the need for more rather than less discussion of IP theory, including more work of the type that Merges’s book undertakes
Similar books and articles
Introduction, in Critical Concepts in Intellectual Property Law: Copyright.Christopher S. Yoo - unknown
Robert Merges: Justifying Intellectual Property: Harvard UP, Cambridge, MA, 2011, Xiv+402 Pp, ISBN 9780674049482. [REVIEW]Gordon Hull - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):169-177.
Are Intellectual Property Rights Compatible with Rawlsian Principles of Justice?Darryl J. Murphy - 2012 - Ethics and Information Technology 14 (2):109-121.
Labor as the Basis for Intellectual Property Rights.Bryan Cwik - 2014 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 17 (4):681-695.
Intellectual Capital – New Object Regulated by Property Law?Asta Jakutytė-Sungailienė - 2009 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 117 (3):339-355.
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Lithuania: Situation After the Implementation of Directive 2004/48/EC on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights. [REVIEW]Ramūnas Birštonas & Virginijus Papirtis - 2011 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 18 (1):113-126.
Rethinking the Ownership of Information in the 21st Century: Ethical Implications. [REVIEW]Tomas A. Lipinski & Johannes Britz - 2000 - Ethics and Information Technology 2 (1):49-71.
Copyright and Incomplete Historiographies: Of Piracy, Propertization, and Thomas Jefferson.Justin Hughes - manuscript
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads