Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (1):27-32 (2014)
AbstractThis paper responds to an invitation by the editors to consider whether the intellectual property regime suggests an appropriate model for protecting interests in detached human body parts. It begins by outlining the extent of existing IP protection for body parts in Europe, and the relevant strengths and weaknesses of the patent system in that regard. It then considers two further species of IP right of less obvious relevance. The first are the statutory rights of ownership conferred by domestic UK law in respect of employee inventions, and the second are the economic and moral rights recognised by European and international law in respect of authorial works. In the argument made, both of these species of IP right may suggest more appropriate models of sui generis protection for detached human body parts than patent rights because of their capacity better to accommodate the relevant public and private interests in respect of the same
Similar books and articles
Is `Property' Necessary? On Owning the Human Body and its Parts.Alexandra George - 2004 - Res Publica 10 (1):15-42.
Legal Rights in Human Bodies, Body Parts and Tissue.Loane Skene - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (2):129-133.
My Body, My Body Parts, My Property?Deryck Beyleveld & Roger Brownsword - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (2):87-99.
Natural Intellectual Property Rights and the Public Domain.Hugh Breakey - 2010 - Modern Law Review 73 (2):208-239.
Are Pharmaceutical Patents Protected by Human Rights?Joseph Millum - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (11):e25-e25.
Intellectual Property, Copyright, and Fair Use in Education.Shaheen E. Lakhan & Meenakshi K. Khurana - 2008 - Cogprints.
The Right to Trade in Human Body Parts.Hillel Steiner - 2002 - In Jonathan Seglow (ed.), Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. F. Cass Publishers. pp. 187-193.
Property Rights in Blood, Genes and Data: Naturally Yours?Jasper A. Bovenberg - 2006 - Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
Against Individualistic Justifications of Property Rights.Rowan Cruft - 2006 - Utilitas 18 (2):154-172.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
A Pluralistic Account of Intellectual Property.D. B. Resnik - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 46 (4):319-335.
Art and Money: Constitutional Rights in the Private Sphere?Graber Christoph Beat & Teubner Gunther - 1998 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 18 (1):61-73.
'Sewing the Fly Buttons on the Statute': Employee Inventions and the Employment Context.Justine Pila - 2012 - Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 32 (2):265-295.
Chemical Products and Proportionate Patents Before and After Generics V Lundbeck.Justine Pila - 2009 - King's Law Journal 20:1-38.