Ending the Mendel–Fisher Controversy [Book Review]

Isis 100:173-174 (2009)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,264

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Statistics is not enough: revisiting Ronald A. Fisher's critique (1936) of Mendel's experimental results (1866).Avital Pilpel - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part C: Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences 38 (3):618-626.
Models and statistical inference: The controversy between Fisher and neyman–pearson.Johannes Lenhard - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (1):69-91.
Science studies and Mendel's paradigm.Vítězslav Orel - 2010 - Perspectives on Science 18 (2):pp. 226-241.
Controversies in the Interpretation of Mendel's Discovery.Vítĕzslav Orel & Daniel L. Hartl - 1994 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 16 (3):423 - 464.
History of Plant Hybridization According to Mendel's Contemporary Rudolf Geschwind.Vítězslav Orel - 1986 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 8 (2):251 - 263.
What would have happened if Darwin had known Mendel (or Mendel's work)?Pablo Lorenzano - 2011 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 33 (1):3-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-01-31

Downloads
6 (#1,104,593)

6 months
1 (#449,844)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references