Differential Galois theory II

Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 88 (2-3):181-191 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

First, it is pointed out how the author's new differential Galois theory contributes to the understanding of the differential closure of an arbitrary differential field . Secondly, it is shown that a superstable differential field has no proper differential Galois extensions

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

An invitation to model-theoretic galois theory.Alice Medvedev & Ramin Takloo-Bighash - 2010 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 16 (2):261 - 269.
Remarks on galois cohomology and definability.Anand Pillay - 1997 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 62 (2):487-492.
Differential forms in the model theory of differential fields.David Pierce - 2003 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 68 (3):923-945.
Elimination of algorithmic quantifiers for ordered differential algebra.Yunfu Shen - 1999 - Archive for Mathematical Logic 38 (3):139-144.
Stabilité polynômiale Des corps différentiels.Natacha Portier - 1999 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 64 (2):803-816.
Fuzzy Galois Connections.Radim Bêlohlávek - 1999 - Mathematical Logic Quarterly 45 (4):497-504.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-16

Downloads
20 (#744,405)

6 months
7 (#425,192)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Superstable groups.Ch Berline & D. Lascar - 1986 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 30 (1):1-43.
Unidimensional theories are superstable.Ehud Hrushovski - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (2):117-137.
Superstable fields and groups.G. Cherlin - 1980 - Annals of Mathematical Logic 18 (3):227.
Superstable differential fields.A. Pillay & Ž Sokolović - 1992 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 57 (1):97-108.
Unidimensional theories are superstable.Katsuya Eda - 1990 - Annals of Pure and Applied Logic 50 (2):117-137.

Add more references